................

[Knifeboy]

Re: ................

http://www.buzzfeed.com/donnad/banne...edium=buzzfeed Man this is depressing

[And we'll just put a happy little bush over here.]

Re: ................

Why not Zoidberg?

[Ars Sycro]

Re: ................

Because it's this weird thing he does...
---
(V) ( ;,,,; ) (V)

[AnewKINDofFEELING]

Re: ................

Pages 829 and 830: Saved xD

For the record, although I don't actually save pages, why?

[dsv]

Re: ................

Pages 829 and 830: Saved xD

[Gnomad]

Re: ................

I think it's creepier to date someone significantly younger than you than it is to have sex with them.
---

[And we'll just put a happy little bush over here.]

Re: ................

...yes.

[noclevername]

Re: ................

Tickle fight?

[And we'll just put a happy little bush over here.]

Re: ................

I fail to follow you entirely.

[noclevername]

Re: ................

What does concern me is the potential for unhealthy dynamics in sex.

Is it your dick?

[And we'll just put a happy little bush over here.]

Re: ................

That's more than fair. I had blocked that out. ::shudders::
---

I think it's important to encourage the few of us that actually get laid on a regular basis.

Never said I am against consensually agreed upon sex. I am a big fan. And I believe it should happen very often. What does concern me is the potential for unhealthy dynamics in sex.

[Knifeboy]

Re: ................

Oh, come on. The hyperbole is stifling. This isn't nearly as low as loving underaged girls, but in a non-sexual way....

ANKOF has a point

[noclevername]

Re: ................

I think it's important to encourage the few of us that actually get laid on a regular basis.

[AnewKINDofFEELING]

Re: ................

New low in Traversing's history of epic lows.

Oh, come on. The hyperbole is stifling. This isn't nearly as low as loving underaged girls, but in a non-sexual way....
---
20 doesn't qualify as ephebophilia.

[And we'll just put a happy little bush over here.]

Re: ................

New low in Traversing's history of epic lows.