Tweet
So I was wondering - to save John the work, and so that the discography could be updated without having to give out any FTP details or the like, what's anyone's opinion on turning the site in to a wiki?
I am, of course, assuming that people know what one is. Put simply, a webpage that everyone can very easily edit. The most famous example is http://wikipedia.org, but there was that whole DFL wiki I once ran and millions of others all over the place.
It wouldn't take too long to hack up a wiki to look like the current site, then migrate all the current data across. I think it would help keep the site up to date, particuarly the gigography.
I was going to ask Jon directly, but I thought I'd keep it open - if no one else thinks it's a good idea there wouldn't be much point anyway. Also, I suck at making polls.
I am, of course, assuming that people know what one is. Put simply, a webpage that everyone can very easily edit. The most famous example is http://wikipedia.org, but there was that whole DFL wiki I once ran and millions of others all over the place.
It wouldn't take too long to hack up a wiki to look like the current site, then migrate all the current data across. I think it would help keep the site up to date, particuarly the gigography.
I was going to ask Jon directly, but I thought I'd keep it open - if no one else thinks it's a good idea there wouldn't be much point anyway. Also, I suck at making polls.
Comment